In November, I joined Nate Silver’s data journalism site, FiveThirtyEight, as the lead writer for science. My first feature for FiveThirtyEight was on a familiar topic, cancer screening. Specifically, I made the case against early detection of cancer. I realize it might seem crazy, but once you take a close look at the data, it doesn’t seem so irrational.
In a similar vein, this week, in JAMA Internal Medicine, I explain why I’ve opted out of mammography. The JAMA piece is a more detailed version of a story I first told in a Washington Post column. Click here to read the full text version and get through the paywall.
“We need to stop thinking about our breasts as hidden time bombs that are going to do us in at any moment,” says Dr. Susan Love.
My latest AnyBody column: Making sense of new studies questioning mammograms: Is the test worth having?
Washington Post, March 18, 2014
A new Canadian study adds to the amassing research suggesting that most of what mammography has done is turn healthy people into sick, but grateful cancer survivors. It’s time to change our goals. We should be aiming to save lives, not create as many cancer patients as we possibly can.
Read more about my take on the latest mammography study at Last Word On Nothing and Slate.