May 1: Denver
Rocky Mountain Tri Club talk, The Science of Endurance and Recovery, with Alex Hutchinson
May 3-5: Lincoln, NE
Lincoln Marathon expo
May 7: Santa Fe, NM
Santa Fe Institute science seminar: What Beer and Running Taught Me About the Scientific Process
May 9: Albuquerque, NM
Bookworks
May 10: Santa Fe
Santa Fe Science Writing Workshop
May 28 – June 1: Orlando, Florida
American College of Sports Medicine annual conference, From Lab Bench to Newsroom: How I Went from Doing Science to Writing About It
June 18: Edwards, Colorado
The Bookworm of Edwards book talk and signing
June 19: Steamboat Springs, Colorado
Bud Werner Memorial Library author series
June 24: Aspen, Colorado
Aspen Ideas Festival
July 1-5, 2019: Lausanne, Switzerland
World Conference of Science Journalists, Seeking elusive truths: How to judge statistical results as a non-statistician
September 5-9: Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
Metascience 2019: Research on the scientific process: Advances, challenges, and new directions
September 18-20: Boulder, Colorado
Training Peaks Endurance Coaching Summit
October 5: Salt Lake City, Utah
University of Utah seminar
October 14-18: Madison, Wisconsin
Writer in residence, University of Wisconsin
December 5: Menlo Park
Silicon Valley Health and Performance Summit
What is the point of this story? All it seems to say is that Tyler lied in the past. He did; he said as much on 60 Minutes. What if he is telling the truth now?
This story just echoes Fabiani’s spin, attacking the character and alleged motivations of people who come out against Lance: liar, liar, liar, greed, alleged book deal etc. As a journalist, shouldn’t you get beyond the name calling and write about whether the allegations are actually true?